Por mi Barrio Citizen Reporting Platform
This overview was generated with AI from the public sources listed below and checked against them before publication. It has not had a complete human fact-check — treat it as a starting point and follow the sources.
19 sourced claims on this page, none individually verified yet — turn on “Sources in the text” to see each one.
How this atlas is made · What “last verified” means · What “source-checked” means · The full record behind this page
Por Mi Barrio was wired straight into Montevideo's complaints system, yet carried only 1% of reports, skewed to the better-off districts. Its makers closed it in 2022.
what does this mean?
The strongest source is an independent non-academic evaluation: an audit office, a government or EU review, or an NGO. It grades who did the looking — not how well the project went. All four grades →Part of 1001 Smart Cities — 1,247 documented projects · 🏙️ 10 more in Montevideo · 🗳️ Citizen participation guide · 🏛️ Governance projects
Por Mi Barrio was built by the Uruguayan NGO DATA on mySociety's FixMyStreet software, under an agreement with the Intendencia de Montevideo and the city's ombudsman, the Defensoría del Vecino. Unlike most FixMyStreet sites it was integrated into the city's own complaints system, so a report about rubbish, trees, potholes or blocked drains became a case in the Intendencia's Sistema Único de Reclamos. It was paid for by a civic-innovation fund of Avina and Omidyar Network, with no municipal money. In its first year, from August 2014 to August 2015, the city registered 1,101 reports through it, 541 of them about cleaning. The platform was replicated in the Costa Rican municipalities of Palmares and Osa and, in 2017, in Rivera. DATA closed it in April 2022.
📊 Impact
A case study by two researchers, published in December 2018 with support from Fundación Avina, found that use was very low: even in Montevideo, its most successful site, Por Mi Barrio carried only 1% of all complaints the Intendencia received. Its reports came disproportionately from better-off areas: the two municipalities with the fewest poor households produced 46.7% of them while holding 23.2% of the city's population, and two thirds of users were men. In the study's survey of 316 users, comments centred on a perceived lack of response from the Intendencia and on opaque handling of complaints.
🎓 Lesson
DATA's own farewell says the project taught it that in civic technology the civic part is what matters, and laughs at its early forecasts, which assumed the only obstacle to better complaint handling was the lack of an app. A reporting channel cannot outrun the office that answers it: users' main grievance was the Intendencia's response, not the software, and the study found that the municipal partners could not sustain their initial commitment. By 2022 the state's digital services could reproduce almost all of Por Mi Barrio's functions and people had moved to social networks and messaging, so DATA retired it.
Sources
📅 How old is the evidence?
Two clocks, kept apart: when this entry’s sources were published, and what has happened to its record in the atlas. Documented span: 2014–2022. 3 of 5 sources carry a publication date, from 5 August 2015 to 15 April 2022.
When the sources were published
- El Observador · pressEl Observador — El 50% de las denuncias en app "Por Mi Barrio" son por problemas de limpieza (5 Aug 2015)
- Zenodo (CERN) · researchCarolina Aguerre and Carla Bonina — Por Mi Barrio: Hallazgos, Lecciones y Futuro (December 2018)
- DATA Uruguay · ngoDATA Uruguay — Una despedida y un agradecimiento a PorMiBarrio.uy (15 Apr 2022)
Show your work What this page rests on and what it can’t tell you · all 19 claims with their sources · the forensic record
Evidence file · public beta 19 addressable claims, 5 source dossiers, one permanent baseline. The file is unreviewed — an AI-assisted structural migration, not a human or expert endorsement. Every revision keeps a permanent copy under revision history.
Inspect the claims, one by one — verbatim text, sources and caveats for all 19
The text below is copied verbatim from the published record. Each claim names the source dossiers that carry it; caveats stay attached to the claim they qualify.
clm-58a6c382852a0252
descriptive
built by the Uruguayan NGO DATA on mySociety's FixMyStreet software
Sources carrying this claim
clm-b8779fd2d3cf03e5
descriptive
under an agreement with the Intendencia de Montevideo and the city's ombudsman, the Defensoría del Vecino
Sources carrying this claim
clm-cbb4c9592b99d08f
descriptive
Unlike most FixMyStreet sites it was integrated into the city's own complaints system
Sources carrying this claim
clm-aff6041e84896ad6
descriptive
a report about rubbish, trees, potholes or blocked drains
Sources carrying this claim
clm-8e8c50862504319a
descriptive
became a case in the Intendencia's Sistema Único de Reclamos
Sources carrying this claim
clm-3cc2e11fc70d6edf
descriptive
paid for by a civic-innovation fund of Avina and Omidyar Network, with no municipal money
Sources carrying this claim
clm-103414f42fc86bff
quantitative
In its first year, from August 2014 to August 2015, the city registered 1,101 reports through it, 541 of them about cleaning
Sources carrying this claim
clm-e3209eabb4372583
quantitative
replicated in the Costa Rican municipalities of Palmares and Osa and, in 2017, in Rivera
Sources carrying this claim
clm-7bfe3f1e02f71ae9
quantitative
DATA closed it in April 2022
Sources carrying this claim
clm-a22ffb94dc583e5f
quantitative
A case study by two researchers, published in December 2018 with support from Fundación Avina
Sources carrying this claim
clm-bd9749cdbd5a6148
quantitative
found that use was very low: even in Montevideo, its most successful site, Por Mi Barrio carried only 1% of all complaints the Intendencia received
Sources carrying this claim
clm-72f5bf5f2ed620c6
quantitative
the two municipalities with the fewest poor households produced 46.7% of them while holding 23.2% of the city's population
Sources carrying this claim
clm-fece3b85c16985a4
descriptive
two thirds of users were men
Sources carrying this claim
clm-452e6f6322a4fcf6
quantitative
In the study's survey of 316 users, comments centred on a perceived lack of response from the Intendencia and on opaque handling of complaints
Sources carrying this claim
clm-fe4efe134465ba7e
descriptive
in civic technology the civic part is what matters
Sources carrying this claim
clm-4785192504005ba9
descriptive
laughs at its early forecasts, which assumed the only obstacle to better complaint handling was the lack of an app
Sources carrying this claim
clm-d64712e9c94d498a
descriptive
users' main grievance was the Intendencia's response, not the software
Sources carrying this claim
clm-55dececb5468acab
descriptive
the study found that the municipal partners could not sustain their initial commitment
Sources carrying this claim
clm-b687cb68cbb64918
quantitative
By 2022 the state's digital services could reproduce almost all of Por Mi Barrio's functions and people had moved to social networks and messaging
Sources carrying this claim
Forensic record — source dossiers, gaps, hashes and the exact revision this page renders
This layer records what is known about each source, what is still missing, and the exact snapshot this page is rendering. A missing date, archive or hash stays visible as missing.
Awaiting operator and domain-expert review; publication of this revision implies neither.
sha256:04f8ebdf261689b81f4a58e52ec01c97641f4c2cbde329d05759dc0603625ad3
- 19
- of 19 claims mapped
- 5
- source dossiers
- 2
- publication dates recorded
- 0
- archives linked
- 0
- exact locators
- 0
- content captures hashed
Governance facts carried by the record
- Operator
- DATA Uruguay, under an agreement with the Intendencia de Montevideo and the Defensoría del Vecino
- Actor types
- civil-society, city-government
- Funding model
- grant
- Funding description
- Avina's Fondo Acelerador de Innovaciones Cívicas, backed by Omidyar Network; no municipal funds.
- Cost
- Not recorded
- Ownership
- Not recorded
- Decision rights
- Not recorded
- Exit conditions
- Not recorded
5 source dossiers
DATA Uruguay — Una despedida y un agradecimiento a PorMiBarrio.uy (15 Apr 2022)
- Stable source ID
src-ad9e7bd659f7720a- Publisher
- Name not classified · data.org.uy
- Type / language
- web-page · language not classified
- Published
- 2022-04-15
- Updated
- Not recorded
- Source last checked
- No source-level check date
- Record last verified
- 2026-11-07
- Dossier created
- 2026-11-07
- Retrieved copy
- No local capture recorded
- Archive
- No archived copy linked
- Content hash
- No captured content hash
- Locator
- Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Open the recorded source note
The operator's farewell post announcing the end of the project. It says Por Mi Barrio was based on mySociety's FixMyStreet and grew out of talks with the Intendencia's open-data team; that DATA learned that in civic technology the civic part is what matters and now laughs at the figures it once expected; that the state's digital-transformation processes can reproduce almost all of its functions; and that communication has moved to social networks and messaging.
mySociety — FixMyStreet community: Por Mi Barrio (case study)
- Stable source ID
src-7e9b443097f74b67- Publisher
- Name not classified · mysociety.org
- Type / language
- web-page · language not classified
- Published
- Not recorded
- Updated
- Not recorded
- Source last checked
- No source-level check date
- Record last verified
- 2026-11-07
- Dossier created
- 2026-11-07
- Retrieved copy
- No local capture recorded
- Archive
- No archived copy linked
- Content hash
- No captured content hash
- Locator
- Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Open the recorded source note
Case-study page by mySociety, the maker of FixMyStreet, describing Por Mi Barrio as a FixMyStreet-based site connected to the council's complaint system and quoting the DATA team's estimate that it handled around 5% of all reports the council received.
- Claims linked
- Background source; no baseline claim points here
El Observador — El 50% de las denuncias en app "Por Mi Barrio" son por problemas de limpieza (5 Aug 2015)
- Stable source ID
src-0b8afb40f2e46680- Publisher
- Name not classified · elobservador.com.uy
- Type / language
- web-page · language not classified
- Published
- 2015-08-05
- Updated
- Not recorded
- Source last checked
- No source-level check date
- Record last verified
- 2026-11-07
- Dossier created
- 2026-11-07
- Retrieved copy
- No local capture recorded
- Archive
- No archived copy linked
- Content hash
- No captured content hash
- Locator
- Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Open the recorded source note
Report on the first year of the app (August 2014 to August 2015): the Intendencia registered 1,101 reports through it, 541 (49%) about cleaning; it was funded with 100,000 dollars from the Avina and Omidyar civic-innovation accelerator fund and received no municipal or government funds.
Carolina Aguerre and Carla Bonina — Por Mi Barrio: Hallazgos, Lecciones y Futuro (December 2018)
- Stable source ID
src-6a621dad00a815b9- Publisher
- Name not classified · zenodo.org
- Type / language
- pdf · language not classified
- Published
- Not recorded
- Updated
- Not recorded
- Source last checked
- No source-level check date
- Record last verified
- 2026-11-07
- Dossier created
- 2026-11-07
- Retrieved copy
- No local capture recorded
- Archive
- No archived copy linked
- Content hash
- No captured content hash
- Locator
- Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Open the recorded source note
Case study by Carolina Aguerre and Carla Bonina, supported by Fundación Avina, based on 25 interviews, a workshop, a survey of 316 Montevideo users and the platform's open data. It finds use very low (in Montevideo only 1% of all complaints to the Intendencia), reports skewed to better-off municipalities (46.7% from the two with the fewest poor households, which hold 23.2% of the population), two thirds of users men, users' comments centred on the Intendencia's lack of response, and municipal partners unable to sustain their initial commitment. It records replication in Palmares (November 2015) and Osa (February 2017) in Costa Rica and in Rivera in 2017.
AGESIC — Catálogo Nacional de Datos Abiertos: Reclamos registrados en el Sistema Único de Reclamos de la Intendencia de Montevideo (dataset page)
- Stable source ID
src-702957f24010c46b- Publisher
- Name not classified · catalogodatos.gub.uy
- Type / language
- web-page · language not classified
- Published
- Not recorded
- Updated
- Not recorded
- Source last checked
- No source-level check date
- Record last verified
- 2026-11-07
- Dossier created
- 2026-11-07
- Retrieved copy
- No local capture recorded
- Archive
- No archived copy linked
- Content hash
- No captured content hash
- Locator
- Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Open the recorded source note
Dataset page for the city's complaints register; it lists third-party apps such as Por Mi Barrio among the channels through which complaints enter the Sistema Único de Reclamos.
- Claims linked
Known limits of this file
- Publisher names and source languages have not yet been classified; domains are recorded without guessing.
- Existing source notes are descriptive locators, not page- or paragraph-exact citations.
- A missing archive, publication date or content hash is shown as null rather than inferred.
- The project-level evidence grade ranks the strongest source in the entry; it is not a truth score for every claim.
Continue exploring
Compare this project
Explore the wider context
📎 Cite this project
1001 Smart Cities (2026). “Por mi Barrio Citizen Reporting Platform” — Montevideo, Uruguay. The Smart City Atlas. https://1001smartcities.org/projects/montevideo-neighborhood-portal/ (last verified 2026-11-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
The underlying data is free to reuse with attribution — see the open data page.
